This site has limited support for your browser. We recommend switching to Edge, Chrome, Safari, or Firefox.
Congratulations! Your order qualifies for free shipping Free Shipping - You are $55 away! (U.S. Only)

Currency

Use coupon code WELCOME10 for 10% off your first order.

Cart 0

Congratulations! Your order qualifies for free shipping You are $55 away from free shipping.
Sorry, looks like we don't have enough of this product.

Products
Pair with
Is this a gift?
Subtotal Free
Shipping, taxes, and discount codes are calculated at checkout

What are the penalties for false non-GMO advertising?

I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. When I first saw a non-GMO label on a box of crackers, I assumed the government had checked every ingredient. That assumption was wrong. A non-GMO claim is a marketing promise, and the penalties for breaking it sit in a few different legal buckets.

A non-GMO label is a truth-in-advertising claim

There is no single federal law that defines “non-GMO” for every food package. The Federal Trade Commission and state courts measure the claim against general rules about truthful advertising. A company needs a reasonable basis for saying a product contains no genetically engineered ingredients. That usually means testing, supplier documentation, and a system that keeps genetically engineered crops separate from non-engineered crops during storage and processing. If a company cannot show that the corn, soy, canola, or sugar beet ingredients came from a supply chain that was tested and kept separate from genetically engineered crops, the Federal Trade Commission treats the non-GMO label as an unsubstantiated claim.

Non-GMO is separate from organic. A product can be non-GMO and still contain pesticides or be highly processed. The label speaks to genetic engineering alone.

Federal penalties from the FTC

The main federal enforcer is the Federal Trade Commission. Section 5 of the FTC Act bans unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce. A false or unsubstantiated non-GMO claim can qualify as deceptive. The Federal Trade Commission’s 2024 inflation adjustment listed $51,744 per violation. A nationwide product launch with thousands of mislabeled packages can be treated as multiple violations, each subject to that cap. The FTC can also ask a court to order the company to stop the claim, send correction notices, and run ads that correct the earlier message.

State penalties

State attorneys general can bring their own cases under state consumer protection laws. California’s false advertising statute, Business and Professions Code section 17536, lets a court impose up to $2,500 for each violation. A false non-GMO claim repeated across many stores or online sales can become many separate violations. Other states have similar laws with their own penalty amounts. Some states also allow the government to recover attorney fees and investigative costs on top of the fines.

Private lawsuits

Companies that make false non-GMO claims can also get sued by competitors and by shoppers. A competitor can sue under the federal Lanham Act, which covers false advertising that affects a rival’s sales. The court can award the competitor the defendant’s profits, damages the competitor can prove, and in exceptional cases attorney fees. Consumers can file class actions under state laws and ask for refunds, statutory damages, and attorney fees.

Industry challenges and correction orders

Beyond courts, advertising industry self-regulatory bodies hear challenges from other companies. A company challenged over a non-GMO claim has to provide substantiation. If it cannot, the body can refer the matter to the Federal Trade Commission or recommend that the ad be withdrawn. That process does not impose a fine by itself, but a public challenge can push a company to change its packaging and reprint labels.

What I look for as a shopper

I treat “non-GMO” as a claim I can check. A third-party verification seal helps because it means an outside program reviewed the product against its own standard. I also read the ingredient list. Products made from corn, soy, canola, or sugar beets have a higher chance of containing genetically engineered ingredients unless the supply chain is controlled, because those crops are widely grown from genetically engineered seed in the United States. Rice, oats, and lentils are less likely to be genetically engineered, though testing still matters.

Clean Monday Meals states that its products are non-GMO. The labels also show recognizable ingredients, so I can hold the non-GMO claim next to the rest of the picture. When a brand is specific about what is inside the jar, the marketing claim has less work to do.

The penalties for a false non-GMO claim can include federal civil penalties over $50,000 per violation, state fines in the thousands per violation, competitor damages, and consumer refunds. That is why I read beyond the seal and ask for detail.